Air India and Indian Airlines: A Merger Gone Wrong?
|
|
Case Details:
Case Code: HROB153
Case Length: 19 Pages
Period: 2007-2012
Organization: Air India
Pub Date: 2013
Teaching Note: Not Available
Countries: India
Industry: Aviation
To download Air India and Indian Airlines: A Merger Gone Wrong?
case study
(Case Code: HROB153) click on the button below, and select the case from the list of available cases:
OR
Price:
For delivery in electronic format: Rs. 400; For delivery through courier (within India): Rs. 400 + Rs. 25 for Shipping & Handling Charges
»
Human Resource, Organization Behavior Case Studies » HRM Short Case Studies
» View Detailed Pricing Info
» How To Order This Case » Business Case Studies » Area Specific Case Studies
» Industry Wise Case Studies
» Company Wise Case Studies
Please note:
This case study was compiled from published sources, and is intended to be used as a basis for class discussion. It is not intended to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a management situation. Nor is it a primary information source.
Chat with us
Please leave your feedback
|
<< Previous
Unplanned Takeoff
The history of AIL goes back to 1932 when Tata Airlines was started by JRD Tata, who was considered as the father of the Indian aviation industry. In July 1946, Tata Airlines was nationalized and was taken over by the Indian Government. It was turned into a public enterprise and renamed as AIL.11 The origin of IAL dates back to 1953 when seven domestic airlines were merged12 to form Indian Airlines Corporation (IAC). IAC's domestic carrier was IAL. IAL enjoyed a monopoly as the domestic air carrier till the Indian economy was liberalized in 1991.13 With the entry of private airlines, IAL's monopoly began to decline.
|
|
With both these flagship air carriers (AIL & IAL) performing poorly, the idea of a merger between the two began to gain ground. Praful Patel submitted the merger plan to the Union Cabinet in March 2006 for approval.14 The Government of India ordered Accenture Inc (Accenture)15 to formulate a road map for the proposed merger.16 According to Accenture, net synergy benefits of Rs17 8.2 billion (against the integration cost of Rs 2 billion) was envisaged, potential recurring synergies were expected to enhance profitability by Rs 6 billion at the end of the 3rd year of merger.18
The merger was approved on March 1, 2007, by the Union Cabinet and the merged body was called the National Aviation Company of India Limited (NACIL).19 It was incorporated on March 30, 2007.20 The merger became effective from August 22, 2007.21 The brand name "Air India" was retained22 as also the "Maharaja"23 as the mascot of the merged entity.24 The logo of AI was a red colored "Swan" shaped image with an orange colored "Konarc Chakra" placed inside. The logo was placed on the tail of the aircraft.
Contrary to expectations, the merged entity started incurring huge losses right from 2007. Thus, the major objective of the merger, i.e. gaining profits, was not fulfilled. AI incurred a loss of Rs 280 billion from April 1, 2007, to March 31, 2012.25 Employee unrest due to unresolved HR issues further aggravated the airline's problems. AI also faced fierce competition from private airlines like IndiGo Airlines, Jet Airways, and Spice Jet, which were quick to take advantage of the troubles at AI and the resulting flight cancellations. These airlines made profits and gained a huge market share at the cost of AI. In addition to these, inconsistent leadership also affected the fortunes of the merged entity adversely.
Excerpts
- Next Pages >>
|
|